Research Article
Roles of Histamine on Allergic Dermatitis
Masahiro Seike*
Corresponding Author: Masahiro Seike, MD, PhD, Department of Food and Nutrition Science, Sagami Women’s Junior College, 2-1-1 Bunkyo Minamiku Sagamihara Kanagawa 252-0383 Japan
Received: February 14, 2018; Accepted: February 27, 2017
Citation: Seike M., (2018) Roles of Histamine on Allergic Dermatitis. Dermatol Clin Res, 4(1): 206-212.
Copyrights: © 2018 Seike M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Share :
  • 732

    Views & Citations
  • 10

    Likes & Shares

It became apparent that histamine exacerbates allergic dermatitis through experiment with histamine-deficient mice. Histamine induces infiltration of inflammatory cells and epidermal hyperplasia in chronic allergic dermatitis. Histamine also induces itchy sensation as well as other pruritogens in allergic dermatitis. Many kinds of cells in the skin express histamine receptors and allergic responses are induced through histamine H 1-4 receptors, especially H1 and H4 receptors.

 

Keywords: Histamine, Contact dermatitis, Atopic dermatitis, Eczematous lesion, Scratching, Four histamine receptors

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory skin diseases, including contact dermatitis and atopic dermatitis (AD), are often characterized by inflammation with pruritus. A major mediator of inflammation and pruritus is histamine. Histamine is a ubiquitous chemical messenger through four pharmacologically distinct receptors. This review summarizes the findings regarding the roles of histamine and four histamine receptors on the development of eczematous lesion and pruritus in allergic dermatitis.

Eczematous Lesions Developed by Histamine in Murine Allergic Contact Dermatitis

Mast cells and basophils mainly secret histamine in the skin. Assessing the effect of histamine in development of eczematous lesions, recognizing in contact dermatitis and AD, in vivo has been difficult, as most observations involve the use of histamine receptor antagonists. Histamine- deficient mice by disrupting the histidine decarboxylase (HDC) gene to solve these problems were produced [1].

Plasma extravasation induced with compound 48/80, an immediate-type response, is produced in HDC (+/+) mice but not in HDC (-/-) mice. On the other hand, contact hypersensitivity, a delayed-type response, is observed as a thickening of the ear skin after 2,4,6-trinitro-1- chlorobenzene challenge and shows no difference between HDC (+/+) and HDC (-/-) mice [2]. Contact hypersensitivity is elicited by single epicutaneous applications of contact sensitizing agent in mice previously sensitized with the same agent. However, contact dermatitis in human usually causes by repeated epicutaneous application of various antigens including contact sensitizing agents and environmental allergens. Repeated epicutaneous application of contact sensitizing agent induces epidermal hyperplasia, accumulation of large numbers of mast cells and CD4+ T cells beneath the epidermis, and elevated serum levels of antigen-specific IgE, similar to observations of AD [3,4]. Contact hypersensitivity response is shifted from a delayed- type hypersensitivity to an immediate-type response by repeated application [5].

The role of histamine in the extent of chronic eczematous lesions induced by repeated application of  contact sensitizing agent was investigated by using HDC (-/-) mice. Daily application of diphenylcyclopropenone induces chronic allergic contact dermatitis (CACD) in mice. Histological examination of the skin reveals that mice display hyperplastic epidermis and mast cells and CD4+ T cells infiltration. The magnitude of hyperplastic epidermis and inflammatory cells is more significant in HDC (+/+) mice than HDC (-/-) ones (Figure 1) [6]. Histamine mediates chemotaxis of mast cells via the H4 receptor and is responsible for mast cell accumulation in allergic tissues. Unique accumulation of mast cells is presumed to be controlled by histamine through H4 receptor binding of mast cells [7]. Infiltration of CD4+ T cells in HDC (+/+) mice is prominent compared to infiltration of HDC (-/-) mice [6]. IL-16, the soluble ligand for CD4+, represents a potent chemoattractant for CD4+ T cells, eosinophils and monocytes, and is mainly derived from activated T cells [8].

IL-16 is therefore thought to be under the control of histamine and plays an important role in the development of cell-mediated immunity, such as delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction [9]. As lymphocytes are stimulated to produce IL-16 by histamine via H4 receptors [10], histamine-induced IL-16 contributes to the development of eczematous lesions in contact dermatitis.

Levels of IL-6 and Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-2, murine homologue of human IL-8, are increased in murine CACD [11]. Histamine enhances IL-6 and IL-8 production in human keratinocytes in vitro [12]. IL-6 enhances B- and T-cell activation and proliferation [13], and stimulates keratinocyte proliferation, resulting in epidermal acanthosis [14, 15]. Keratinocytes express abundant HDC protein and the levels increase in atopic skin [16].

 

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are a subset of T cells, which regulate effector T cells and lead to immune tolerance to reduction of allergic reactions, and play a role in the maintenance of immunological self-tolerance by actively suppressing self-reactive lymphocytes [17]. Tregs suppress effector T cells and ameliorate contact dermatitis [18]. TGF- β is one of the main regulators of Treg recruitment in allergic lesion [19]. Since the level of TGF-β1 and the number of Tregs in eczematous lesions is significantly higher in HDC (-/-) mice compared to HDC (+/+) mice, histamine suppresses Tregs mediated by TGF-β1 in the skin lesions [20]. The level of IL-10 is also suppressed by histamine in CACD [20]. Since Th2 cell-driven allergic reactions are suppressed through IL-10 production [21], histamine aggravates eczematous lesions by reduction of the level of IL-10.

 

Th17 cells, a distinct lineage of effector CD4+ T cells, are characterized by their production of IL-17 and IL-22 [22]. IL-17 plays an important role in activating T cells in allergen-specific T-cell-mediated immune responses [23]. IL-17 efficiently amplifies the allergic reaction by rendering T cells accessible to recruitment at the site of skin inflammation in allergic contact dermatitis [24]. Th17 cells inhibit IL-4 production by Th2 cells [25]. Infiltration of IL- 17F expressing cells in CACD is suppressed in HDC (+/+) mice compared to HDC (-/-) mice. Levels of IL-17 and IL- 22 of skin lesions decrease in HDC (+/+) mice compared to HDC (-/-) mice (unpublished data). These data indicate that histamine may aggravate skin lesions of CACD by suppressing Th17 cells.

 

Scratching Behavior Induced by Histamine in Murine Allergic Contact Dermatitis

Pruritus has been defined as an unpleasant sensation that triggers a desire to scratch [26]. Contact dermatitis is known as the common skin disease with itch sensation as the typical symptoms and is frequently accompanied by itch-associated scratching behavior in rodents [27]. Examination of mechano-insensitive C-nociceptors has identified C- nociceptors that respond to histamine iontophoresis in parallel with the itch rating [28]. Scratching behavior is observed in HDC (+/+) mice almost not in HDC (-/-) ones after DCP application [29]. Scratching behavior is ameliorated in mice treated with H1 and H4 receptor antagonist [30]. The massively increased itch in lesional skin of patients with AD is based on sensitization for itch in the spinal cord rather than in primary affected neuron [31]. A small number of c-Fos (+) cells, excited sensory cells, are identified in the spinal dorsal horn of HDC (+/+) and HDC (-/-) mice. However, remarkable increase in c-Fos (+) cells is observed to lamina I in the dorsal horn of CACD-developed HDC (+/+) mice, whereas it is not in CACD-developed HDC (-/-) mice. Substance P expression in the spinal dorsal horn increases with peripheral sensory stimulation induced from eczematous lesions [32]. Substance P expression in the spinal dorsal horn is increased only in CACD-developed HDC (+/+) mice. Since substance P is released from peripheral nerves, histamine is responsible for substance P expression in the spinal dorsal horn via peripheral nerves. E- cadherin, one of the synapse-related molecules, is expanded in the spinal dorsal horn by peripheral sensory stimulation induced from allergic dermatitis [32]. E-cadherin expression is increased only in the spinal dorsal horn of CACD- developed HDC (+/+) mice. The nerve fiber proliferation and/or synapse formation might augment itch sensation only in CACD-developed HDC (+/+) mice [29]. Taken together, scratching behavior is mainly mediated with histamine and the afferent pathway of sensation connects with the central nervous system through lamina I of the spinal dorsal horn in murine CACD [29]. Pruritus is known to be induced by a variety of mediators in addition to histamine. Primary sensory nerves transmit the pruritic signal by protease, endothelin-1, IL-4, IL-13, IL-31, chloroquine, and so on [33]. Mas-related G protein-couple receptors and gastrin- releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) mediate the pruritic sensation in primary sensory nerves and dorsal spinal cord, respectively [34,35]. Another characteristic of pruritus in patients with AD is its chronicity. With chronic pruritus, scratching causes skin lesions, which in turn lead to activation of STAT3 in spinal dorsal horn astrocytes. Induction of lipocalin 2 by astrocytes sensitizes a pruritus- processing neuronal network involving GRPR+ spinal dorsal horn neurons, and thereby contributes to the vicious cycle of itching and scratching and chronic pruritus [36]. Th2 cells produce IL-31 and its receptor (IL-31 receptor A) is expressed on primary sensory nerves [37]. Anti-IL-31 receptor A injection inhibits pruritus in AD [38]. IL-33 signaling is functionally present in primary sensory neurons and induces pruritus in poison ivy allergic dermatitis [39]. Plasma levels of substance P are associated with disease activity of AD [40]. Substance P receptor (neurokinin 1 receptor) antagonist reduces scratch behavior in murine allergic dermatitis model [41].

 

Four Histamine Receptors in the Skin

A major mediator of allergic reactions and inflammation is histamine. High amounts of histamine are released during allergic and inflammatory disorders [42]. Histamine is a ubiquitous chemical messenger that displays numerous functions mediated through at least four pharmacological distinct receptors (Table 1).

H1 receptor is expressed in keratinocytes, endothelial cells and peripheral nerves [43]. Histamine augments the production of IL-6, IL-8 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in human keratinocytes [12,44]. Histamine modulates the differentiation from epidermal keratinocytes and impairs the skin barrier function via H1 receptor [45]. The level of nerve growth factor is higher in AD than in healthy controls and correlated with the severity of itch, erythema, eosinophil count and LDH levels. The nerve growth factor level is decreased by H1 receptor antagonist [46]. Elevated expression of periostin, which is a matricelluar protein and contributes to tissue remodeling, is found in lesional skin from AD patients. Histamine induces the expression of periostin and H1 receptor  antagonist blocks both periostin and collagen expression [47]. High numbers of H1 receptor expressing CD68 + macrophages  are detected in the dermis of AD skin lesions. FcɛRI stimulation promotes the generation of H1 receptor expressing macrophage-like cells with enhanced histamine biosynthesis and H1 receptor-mediated proinflammatory properties [48]. Lack of H1 receptor expression on dendritic cells leads to diminished IL-12, upregulated IL-23, and IL-6 production upon allergen stimulation. H1 receptor engagement on dendritic cells is necessary for dendritic cell activation and subsequent priming of effector IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells [49]. The characteristic features of H1 receptor activation in the skin are exemplified by increased vascular permeability [50] and itching transactions [51]. H1 receptor antagonists have been successfully used as drugs for treating allergic diseases, since these functions contribute to allergic responses [52].

 

The H2 receptor is expressed in keratinocytes, macrophages and lymphocytes [53]. Histamine induces an increase in intracellular Ca2+ of cultured normal human keratinocytes via H2 receptor [54]. H2 receptor stimulates the phospholipase C signaling pathway in mouse keratinocyte [55]. Histamine-induced stimulation of phosphodiesterase 4, which increases in blood mononuclear white cells of patients with AD, is mediated by the H2 receptor and related to intracellular cAMP in the human monocyte cell line [56]. H2 receptor agonist downregulates IL-12p70 production of prestimulated human monocyte-derived dendritic cells [57]. H2 receptor antagonist blocks histamine-induced IL-16 release from human CD8+ T cells [10]. However, its extra function in the skin remains unclear.

 

The H3 receptor is expressed in mast cells and sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves and regulates histamine, serotonin, acetylcholine and other neurotransmitters [58]. H3 antagonist inhibits cutaneous microvascular permeability due to intradermal injections of compound 48/80 [59]. H3 receptor antagonist increases scratching behavior in ICR mice [60] and mast cell-deficient mice [61]. Substance P is involved in the scratching behavior elicited by H3 receptor antagonist [62]. Histamine induces a calcium increase in the skin-specific sensory neurons via activation of the H1 receptor and H4 receptor as well as inhibition of the H3 receptor. The decreased threshold in response to H3 receptor antagonism assumes to activate H1 and H4 receptor on sensory neurons, which in turn results in the excitation of histamine-sensitive afferents and therefore elicits the sensation of itch [63]. However, the exact physiological roles of H3 receptor in the skin remain to be explored.

 

H4 receptor knockout mice show a clear amelioration of the skin lesions, with a diminished influx of inflammatory cells and a reduced amount of IgE, a reduced number of splenocytes and lymph node cells with a decreased number of CD4+ T cells in a chronic model of AD [64]. The H4 receptor is upregulated during differentiation of keratinocytes in the upper layer of epidermis versus keratinocytes in basal layer [65]. H4 receptor is highly expressed on keratinocytes from patients with AD and its stimulation induces keratinocyte proliferation [66]. H4 receptor is also expressed in leukocytes and mast cells [67]. H4 receptor expression on Th2 cells is higher compared with Th1 cells and stimulation of H4 receptor results in an induction of transcription factor AP-1 in Th2 cells,  which are dominant in allergic dermatitis [68]. H4 receptor antagonist inhibits the production of CCL17 and CCL22, Th2 chemokine, in monocyte-derived Langerhans cells in patients with AD [69]. Th17 cells, expressing the H4 receptor, play a potential role in AD and the number of this cell type is associated with the severity of AD in the acute lesions [70]. IL-17 expression is enhanced in AD [71]. Th17 function is one of the important factors regulating allergic diseases such as CACD and AD [72]. Natural killer cells accumulate in eczematous lesions of AD via H4 receptor [73]. Histamine induces chemotaxis of eosinophils through the H4 receptor [74] and rapidly induces shape changes in eosinophils while at the same time enhancing their chemotactic response to chemokines through the H4 receptor [74, 75]. H4 receptor also mediates histamine-induced

chemotaxis of mast cells in mouse [7, 76]. H4 receptor antagonist ameliorates CACD in HDC (+/+) mice, while H4 receptor agonist develops CACD in HDC (-/-) ones [77]. H4 receptor is involved in pruritic responses in mice to a greater extent than H1 receptor [78]. Taken together, these results strongly indicate that H4 receptor antagonism is effective for allergic dermatitis.

 

CONCLUSION

Histamine is related to development of eczematous lesions and scratching behavior in murine allergic contact dermatitis. Since histamine receptors play an important role on allergic dermatitis, anti-histamine receptor agents are effective to treat allergic dermatitis, such as CACD and AD.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None declared.

1.        Ohtsu H, Tanaka S, Terui T, et al. (2001) Mice lacking histidine decarboxylase exhibit abnormal mast cells. FEBS Lett 502: 53-56.
2.        Ohtsu H, Kuramasu A, Tanaka S, et al. (2002) Plasma extravasation induced by dietary supplemented histamine in histamine-free mice. Eur J Immunol 32: 1698-1708.
3.        Wang G, Savinko T, Wolff H, et al. (2007) Repeated epicutaneous exposure to ovalbumin progressively induce atopic dermatitis-like lesions in mice. Clin Exp Allergy 37: 151-161.
4.        Man MQ, Hatano Y, Lee SH, et al. (2008) Characterization of a hapten-induced, murine model with multiple features of atopic dermatitis: structural, immunologic, and biochemical changes following single versus multiple oxazolone challenges. J Invest Dermatol 128: 79-86.
5.        Kitagaki H, Fujisawa S, Watanabe K, et al. (1995) Immediate-type hypersensitivity response followed by a late reaction is induced by repeated epicutaneous application of contact sensitizing agents in mice. J Invest Dermatol 105: 749-755.
6.        Seike M, Takata T, Ikeda M, et al. (2005) Histamine helps development of eczematous lesions in experimental contact dermatitis in mice. Arch Dermatol Res 297: 68-74.
7.        Hofstra CL, Desai PJ, Thurmond RL, et al. (2003) Histamine H4 receptor mediates chemotaxis and calcium mobilization of mast cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 305: 1212-1221.
8.        Kaser A, Dunzendorfer S, Offner FA, et. al. (1999) A role for IL-16 in the cross-talk between dendritic cells and T cells. J Immunol 163: 3232-3238.
9.        Yoshimoto T, Wang CR, Yoneto T, et. al. (2000) Role of IL-16 in delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction. Blood 95: 2869-2874.
10.      Gantner F, Sakai K, Tusche MW, et al. (2002) Histamine h(4) and h(2) receptors control histamine- induced interleukin-16 release from human CD8 (+) T cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 303: 300-307.
11.      Hamada R, Seike M, Kamijima R, et al. (2006) Neuronal conditions of spinal cord in dermatitis are improved by olopatadine. Eur J Pharmacol 547: 45-51.
12.      Kohda F, Koga T, Uchi H, et.al. (2002) Histamine- induced IL-6 and IL-8 production are differently modulated by IFN-γ and IL-4 in human keratinocytes. J Dermatol Sci 28: 34-41.
13.      Hirano T, Akira S, Taga T, et al. (1990) Biological and clinical aspects of interleukin 6. Immunol Today 11: 443-449.
14.      Grossman RM, Krueger J, Yourish D, et al. (1989) Interleukin 6 is expressed in high levels in psoriatic skin and stimulates proliferation of cultured human keratinocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 6367-6371.
15.      Kupper TS, Min K, Sehgal PB, et al. (1989)  Production of IL-6 by keratinocytes: implications for epidermal inflammation and immunity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 557: 454-464.
16.      Gutowska-Owsiak D, Greenwald L, Watson C, et al. (2014) The histamine-synthesizing enzyme histindine decarboxylase is upregulated by keratinocytes in atopic skin. Br J Dermatol 171: 771-778.
17.      Hori S, Nomura T, Sakaguchi S (2003) Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3. Science 299: 1057-1061.
18.      Ring S, Schӓfer SC, Mahnke K, et al. (2006) CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells suppress contact hypersensitivity reactions by blocking influx of effector T cells into inflamed tissue. Eur J Immunol 36: 2981-2992.
19.      Fantini MC, Becker C, Monteleone G, et al. (2004) Cutting edge: TGF-beta induces a regulatory phenotype in CD4+CD25- T cells through Foxp3 induction and down-regulation of Smad7. J Immunol 172: 5149-5153.
20.      Tamaka K, Seike M, Hagiwara T, et al. (2015) Histamine suppresses regulatory T cells mediated by TGF-β in murine chronic allergic contact dermatitis. Exp Dermatol 24: 280-284.
21.      Kearley J, Barker JE, Robinson DS, et al. (2005) Resolution of airway inflammation and hyperreactivity after in vivo transfer of CD4+CD25+ regulatory  T cells is interleukin 10 dependent. J Exp Med 202: 1539-1547.
22.      Liang SC, Tan X, Luxenberg DP, et al. (2006) Interleukin (IL)-22 and IL-17 are coexpressed by Th17 cells and cooperatively enhance expression of antimicrobial peptides. J Exp Med 203: 2271-2279.
23.      Nakae S, Komiyama Y, Nambu A, et al. (2002) Antigen-specific T cell sensitization is impaired in IL- 17-dificient mice, causing suppression of allergic cellular and humoral responses. Immunity 17: 375-387.

24.      Pennino D, Eyerich K, Scarponi C, et al. (2010) Il-17 amplifies human contact hypersensitivity by licensing hapten nonspecific Th1 cells to kill autologous keratinocytes. J Immunol 184: 4880-4888.
25.      Yi T, Chen Y, Wang L, et al. (2009) Reciprocal differentiation and tissue-specific pathogenesis of Th1, TH2, and Th17 cells in graft-versus-host disease. Blood 114: 3101-3112.
26.      Ikoma A, Cevikbas F, Kempkes C, et al. (2011) Anatomy and neurophysiology of pruritus. Semin Cutan Med Surg 30: 64-70.
27.      Nojima H, Carstens E (2003) 5-Hydroxytryptamine (5- HT)2 receptor involvement in acute 5-HT-evoked scratching but not in allergic pruritus induced by dinitrofluorobenzene in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 306, 245-252.
28.      Schmelz M, Schmidt R, Bickel A, et al. (1997) Specific C-receptors for itch in human skin. J Neurosci 17: 8003-8008.
29.      Seike M, Ikeda M, Kodama H, et al. (2005) Inhibition of scratching behavior caused by contact dermatitis in histidine decarboxylase gene knockout mice. Exp Dermatol 14: 169-175.
30.      Köchling H, Schaper K, Wilzopolski J, et al. (2017) Combined treatment with H1 and H4 receptor antagonists reduces inflammation in a mouse model of atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol Sci 87: 130-137.
31.      Ikoma A, Rukwied R, Stander S, et al. (2003)  Neuronal sensitization for histamine-induced itch in lesional skin of patients with atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 139: 1455-1458.
32.      Seike M, Hamada R, Ikeda M, et al. (2005) Alteration of sensorineural circuits in spinal cord by chronic contact dermatitis. Somatosens Mot Res 22: 115-121.
33.      Paller AS, Kabashima K, Bieber T (2017) Therapeutic pipeline for atopic dermatitis: End of the drought? J Allergy Clin Immunol 140: 633-643.
34.      Sun YG, Chen ZF (2007) A gastrin-releasing peptide receptor mediates the itch sensation in the spinal cord. Nature 448: 700-703.
35.      Liu Q, Tang Z, Surdenikova L, et al. (2008) Sensory neuron-specific GPCR Mrgprs are itch receptors mediating chloroquine-induced pruritus. Cell 139: 1353-1365.
36.      Shiratori-Hayashi M, Koga K, Tozaki-Saitoh H, et al. (2015) STAT3-dependent reactive astrogliosis in the spinal dorsal horn underlies chronic itch. Nat Med 21: 927-931.
37.      Dillon SR, Sprecher C, Hammond A, et al. (2004) Interleukin 31, a cytokine produced by activated T cells, induces dermatitis in mice. Nat Immunol 5: 752- 760.
38.      Ruzicka T, Hanifin JM, Furue M, et al. (2017) Anti- interleukin-31 receptor a antibody for atopic  dermatitis. N Engl J Med 376: 826-835.

 

39.      Liu B, Tai Y, Achanta S, et al. (2016) IL-31/ST2 signaling excites sensory neurons and mediates itch response in a mouse model of poison ivy contact allergy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113: E7572-E7579.
40.      Toyoda M, Nakamura M, Makino T, et al. (2002) Nerve growth factor and substance P are useful plasma markers of disease activity in atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 147: 71-79.
41.      Ohmura T, Hayashi T, Satoh Y, et al. (2004) Involvement of substance P in scratching behavior in an atopic dermatitis model. Eur J Pharmacol 491: 191- 194.
42.      Stander S, Steinhoff M (2002) Pathophysiology of pruritus in atopic dermatitis: an overview. Exp Dermatol 11: 12-24.
43.      Baumer W, Rossbach K (2010) Histamine as an immunomodulator. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 8: 495-504.
44.      Kanda N, Watanabe S (2004) Histamine enhances the production of granulocyte-macrophage colony- stimulating factor via protein kinase Calpha and exracellular signal-regulatyed kinase in human keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol 122: 863-872.
45.      Gschwandtner M, Mildner M, Mlitz V, et al. (2013) Histamine suppresses epidermal keratinocyte differentiation and impairs skin barrier function in a human skin model. Allergy 68: 37-47.
46.      Yamaguchi J, Aihara M, Kobayashi Y, et al. (2009) Quantitative analysis of nerve growth factor (NGF) in the atopic dermatitis and psoriasis horny layer and effect of treatment on NGF in atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol Sci 53: 48-54.
47.      Yang L, Murota H, Serada S, et al. (2014) Histamine contributes to tissue remodeling via periostin expression. J Invest Dermatol 134: 2105-2113.
48.      Novak N, Peng WM, Bieber T, et al. (2013) FcɛRI stimulation promotes the differentiation of histamine receptor 1-expressing inflammatory macrophages. Allergy 68: 454-461.
49.      Vanbervliet B, Akdis M, Vocanson M, et al. (2011) Histamine receptor H1 signaling on dendritic cells plays a key role in the IFN-γ/IL-17 balance in T cell- mediated skin inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol 127: 943-953.
50.      Sercombe R, Verrecchia C, Philipson V, et al. (1986) Histmaine-induced constriction and dilatation of rabbit middle cerebral arteries in vitro: role of the endothelium. Blood Vessels 23: 137-153.
51.      Hagermark O, Strandberg K, Gronneberg R (1979) Effects of histamine receptor antagonists on histamine- induced responses in human skin. Acta dermato- venereologica 59: 297-300.
52.      Simons FE, Simons KJ (2011) Histamine and H1- antihistamines: celebrating a century of progress. J Allergy Clin Immunol 128: 1139-1150.

53.      Akdis CA, Simons FE (2006) Histamine receptor are hot in immunopharmacology. Eur J Pharmacol 533: 69-76.
54.      Koizumi H, Ohkawara A (1999) H2 histamine receptor-mediated increase in intracellular Ca2+ in cultured human keratinocytes. J Dermatol Sci 21: 127- 132.
55.      Fitzsimons C, Durăn H, Engel N, et al. (1999) Changes in H2 receptor expression and coupling during Ca2+- induced differentiation in mouse epidermal keratinocytes. Inflamm Res 48: Suppl 1 S73-74.
56.      Delgado M, Fuentes JA, Fernandez-Alfonso MS (2003) Histamine up-regulates phosphodiesterase IV activity in U-937 cells through H2 receptor stimulation and cAMP increase. Med Sci Monit 9: BR212-219.
57.      Gutzmer R, Langer K, Lisewski M, et al. (2002) Expression and function of histamine receptors 1 and 2 on human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol 109: 524-531.
58.      Sander K, Kottke T, Stark H (2008) Histamine H3 receptor antagonists go to clinics. Biol Pharm Bull 31: 2163-2181.
59.      McLeod RL, Mingo GG, Kreutner W, et al. (2005) Effect of combined histamine H1 and H3 receptor blockade on cutaneous microvascular permeability elicited by compound 48/80. Life Sci 76: 1787-1794.
60.      Sugimoto Y, Iba Y, Nakamura Y, et al. (2004) Pruritus-associated response mediated by cutaneous histamine H3 receptors. Clin Exp Allergy 34: 456-459.
61.      Hossen MA, Sugimoto Y, Kayasuga R, et al. (2003) Involvement of histamine H3 receptors in scratching behaviour in mast cell-deficient mice. Br J Dermatol 149: 17-22.
62.      Hossen MA, Inoue T, Shinmei Y, et al. (2006) Role of substance P on histamine H(3) antagonist-induced scratching behavior in mice. J Pharmacol Sci 100: 297- 302.
63.      Rossbach K, Nassenstein C, Gschwandtner M, et al. (2011) Histamine H1, H3 and H4 receptors are involved in pruritus. Neuroscience 190: 89-102.
64.      Rossbach K, Schaper K, Kloth Ch, et al. (2016) Histamine H4 receptor knockout mice display reduced inflammation in a chronic model of atopic dermatitis. Allergy 71: 189-197.
65.      Yamaura K, Oda M, Suwa E, et al. (2009) Expression of histamine H4 receptor in human epidermal tissues and attenuation of experimental pruritus using H4 receptor antagonist. J Toxico Sci 34: 427-431.
66.      Glatzer F, Gschwandtner M, Ehling S, et al. (2013) Histamine induces proliferation in keratinocytes from patients with atopic dermatitis through the histamine 4 receptor. J Allergy Clin Immunol 132: 1358-1367.
67.      Oda T, Morikawa N, Saito Y, et al. (2000) Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel type of histamine receptor preferentially expressed in leukocytes. J Biol Chem 275: 36781-36786.

 
68.      Gutzmer R, Mommert S, Gschwandtner M, et al. (2009) The histamine H4 receptor is functionally expressed on T(H)2 cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol 123: 619-625.
69.      Miyano K, Matsushita S, Tsuchida T, et al. (2016) Inhibitory effect of a histamine 4 receptor antagonist on CCL17 and CCL22 production by monocyte- derived Langerhans cells in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol 43: 1024-1029.
70.      Koga C, Kabashima K, Shiraishi N, et al. (2008) Possible pathogenic role of Th17 cells for atopic dermatitis. J Invest Drematol 128: 2625-2630.
71.      Batista DI, Perez L, Orfail RL, et al. (2015) Profile of skin barrier proteins (filaggrin, claudins 1 and 4) and Th1/Th2/Th17 cytokines in adults with atopic dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 29: 1091- 1095.
72.      Matsushita A, Seike M, Hagiwara T, et al. (2014) Close relationship between T helper (Th) 17 and Th2 response in murine ACD. Clin Exp Dermatol 39: 924- 931.
73.      Ehling S, Rossbach K, Dunston SM, et al. (2016) Allergic inflammation is augmented via histamine H4 receptor activation: The role of natural killer cells in vitro and in vivo. J Dermatol Sci 83: 106-115.
74.      Ling P, Ngo K, Nguyen S, et al. (2004) Histamine H4 receptor mediates eosinophil chemotaxis with cell shape and adhesion molecule upregulation. Br J Pharmacol 142: 161-171.
75.      Buckland KF, Williams TJ, Conroy DM (2003) Histamine induces cytoskeletal changes in human eosinophils via the H(4) receptor. Br J Pharmacol 140: 1117-1127.
76.      Thurmond RL, Desai PJ, Dunford PJ, et al. (2004) A potent and selective histamine H4 receptor antagonist with anti-inflammatory properties. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 309: 404-413.
77.      Seike M, Furuya K, Omura M, et al. (2010) Histamine H4 receptor antagonist ameliorates chronic allergic contact dermatitis induced by repeated challenge. Allergy 65: 319-326.
78.      Dunford PJ, Williams KN, Desai PJ, et al. (2007) Histamine H4 receptor antagonists are superior to traditional antihistamines in the attenuation of experimental pruritus. J Allergy Clin Immunol 119: 176-183.