Research Article
A Short Review about the Effects of Lasers on Enamel Surface
Soltanmohamadi Borujeni Elahe*
Corresponding Author: Soltanmohamadi Borujeni Elahe, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Received: May 25, 2021; Revised: June 18, 2021; Accepted: June 21, 2021 Available Online: July 08, 2021
Citation: Elahe SB. (2021) A Short Review about the Effects of Lasers on Enamel Surface. J Oral Health Dent, 4(3): 363-364.
Copyrights: ©2021 Elahe SB. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Share :
  • 609

    Views & Citations
Enamel etching is a major step in preparing teeth for bonding of brackets. Due to the increasing use of lasers in different fields of dentistry, this mini-review is discussed effects of lasers on enamel structure.

Keywords: Laser, Enamel, Etching, SEM

Er: YAG: Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet Laser; Er, Cr: YSGG: Erbium, Chromium-Doped Yttrium, Scandium, Gallium and Garnet Laser; SEM: Scanning Electron Microscopy; SBS: Shear Bond Strength

Direct bonding to enamel is one of the important parameters in orthodontics. Enamel etching is a major step in enhancing bond strength between tooth and bracket.

Currently, the use of 37% phosphoric acid is the standard protocol for enamel conditioning [1] but using lasers with different characteristics is also a new proposed way for etching enamel. Lasers such as Er: YAG seems to have minor side effects on enamel while this type of laser can etch enamel surface in an effective way. Regard shear bond strength, some articles have confirmed that Er: YAG laser can be an appropriate alternative for acid etching [2-7]; while the others have rejected this hypothesis [8-11]. By the way, enamel morphology is a less investigated part of studies about the effects of laser etching. Therefore, we conducted a study to find enamel morphological characteristics through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after enamel conditioning using Er: YAG laser in first and second bonding procedure.

The results were somehow predictable; in both first and second bonding procedures, the enamel of acid etched samples showed regular honey comb etching pattern in most areas, while the other less popular patterns were observable in some parts. Laser etched enamels had amorphous irregular surface without any typical etching patterns.
In another study our team investigated the strength of enamel brace bonding using Er: YAG and found out that although the laser is effective and can potentially etch enamel but bond strength in laser etched samples is significantly lower than acid etched ones [12].

It can be concluded that bond strength has a relationship with enamel etching pattern; this relation seems to be partial but it’s obvious that regular etching pattern can enhance shear bonding strength. From this point of view, conventional acid conditioning seems to be more effective than laser irradiation; but in some cases, this parameter is more than 40 MPa and can damage tooth structure during bracket debonding.

Therefore, laser irradiation seems to be a safer approach for enamel preparation. The paper was published in 2017; improving technology can enhance bond strength in laser-based teeth.

Not only the Er: YAG can affect enamel characteristics, but also another laser types may have the same or even better effect:

According to one study, despite fluoride varnish, lasers like CO2 and Er, Cr: YSGG are successful in increasing the enamel surface microhardness. Surface treatment with CO2 laser created cracks and fissures and Er, Cr: YSGG increases enamel resistance to demineralization [13]. Results of published literature about the effect of lasers on enamel structure are limited and controversial. As a study in 2014 showed no significant advantages in use of Er: YAG laser over phosphoric acid [14]. This controversy is the main reason to investigate strange world of Enamel.


Although Er: YAG is a suitable laser for dental purposes, its effect on enamel is still unknown and controversial. Results of some studies indicated that using this laser as enamel etchant could make favorable SBS (mean bond strength is clinically acceptable although it is lower than SBS of acid etched enamel) but enamel structure seems to be irregular and no signs of honey comb view observed in most published papers; Thus, more studies are needed to find the relation between SEM analysis of laser etched enamel and decreased SBS of laser etched samples.
  1. Hashim NT, Gasmalla BG, Sabahelkheir AH, Awooda AM (2014) Effect of the clinical application of the diode laser (810 nm) in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity. BMC Res Notes 7: 31.
  2. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, et al. (2003) Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28(3): 215-235.
  3. Marimoto AK, Cunha LA, Yui KC, Huhtala MF, Barcellos DC, et al. (2013) Influence of Nd: YAG laser on the bond strength of self-etching and conventional adhesive systems to dental hard tissues. Oper Dent 38(4): 447-455.
  4. Hayakawa K (2005) Nd: YAG laser for debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128(5): 638-647.
  5. Swartz ML (1988) Ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 22(2): 82-88.
  6. Bishara SE, Forrseca JM, Fehr DE, Boyer DB (1994) Debonding forces applied to ceramic brackets simulating clinical conditions. Angle Orthod 64(4): 277-282.
  7. Bishara SE, Fehr DE, Jakobsen JR (1993) A comparative study of the debonding strengths of different ceramic brackets, enamel conditioners, and adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104(2): 170-179.
  8. Jou GL, Leung RL, White SN, Zernik JH (1995) Bonding ceramic brackets with light-cured glass ionomer cements. J Clin Orthod 29(3): 184-187.
  9. Krejci I, Simunovic K, Lutz F (1992) Substance ablation with a superpulsed CO2 laser. [Article in German]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 102(6): 693-699.
  10. Iijima M, Yasuda Y, Muguruma T, Mizoguchi I (2010) Effects of CO2 laser debonding of a ceramic bracket on the mechanical properties of enamel. Angle Orthod 80(6): 1029-1035.
  11. Tehranchi A, Fekrazad R, Zafar M, Eslami B, Kalhori KA, et al. (2011) Evaluation of the effects of CO2 laser on debonding of orthodontics porcelain brackets vs. the conventional method. Lasers Med Sci 26(5): 563-567.
  12. Borujeni SE, Chalipa J, Etemadi A, Nasiri M, Kharrazifard MJ, et al. (2021) Comparison of Shear Bond Strength, Adhesive Remnant Index and Enamel Cracks in Bonding and Rebonding of Stainless-Steel Brackets to Enamel Surface Conditioned with Er: YAG Laser Versus Conventional Acid Etching. Front Dent pp: 18.
  13. Kaur T, Tripathy T, Rai P, Kanase A (2017) SEM Evaluation of Enamel Surface Changes and Enamel Microhardness around Orthodontic Brackets after Application of CO2 Laser, Er, Cr: YSGG Laser and Fluoride Varnish: An In vivo J Clin Diagn Res 11(9): 59-63.
  14. Ierardo G, Di Carlo G, Petrillo F, Luzzi Z, Vozza I, et al. (2014) Er: YAG Laser for Brackets Bonding: A SEM Study after Debonding. Sci World J 2014: 935946.