Clinical Investigation
Clinical Concepts of High‑Flow Oxygenation Therapy
Ali Jabbari*, Shabnam Tabasi and Behrang Nooralishahi
Corresponding Author: Ali Jabbari, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Ischemic Disorders Research Center of Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Received: November 06, 2022; Revised: November 18, 2022; Accepted: November 21, 2022 Available Online: December 01, 2022
Citation: Jabbari A, Tabasi S & Nooralishahi B. (2022) Clinical Concepts of High‑Flow Oxygenation Therapy. Int J Anaesth Res, 5(1): 196-199.
Copyrights: ©2022 Jabbari A, Tabasi S & Nooralishahi B. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Share :
  • 525

    Views & Citations
  • 10

    Likes & Shares
Respiratory failure and hypercarbic hypoxia is one of the challenging problems in critically ill patients. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is one of the conventional methods of respiratory support in these conditions. High-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) has been recognized as an effective method of noninvasive ventilatory support. A variety of devices are available for use in the HFOT set to provide maximum flow rate and humidity. Physiological benefits of using HFOT include reducing dehydration of airway mucosa, improving clearance of respiratory tract secretions, increased tidal volume, reducing alveolar atelectasis and decreased respiratory rate. While NIPPV increases anatomical dead space, HFOT decreases dead space. HFOT is effective for the treatment of mild to moderate hyper carbic hypoxemic respiratory failure. It has been used in respiratory disorders after surgery, acute heart failure, management of respiratory failure in the intensive care unit and during bronchoscopy. HFOT has been used as a primary treatment strategy in patients during the Covid-19 era.

It had a significant effect on the patient's morale and decrease respiratory effort. It seems that we need more precise evidence to determine the basic criteria for prescribing HFOT during daily exercise.

Keywords
: High‑flow oxygenation therapy, Respiratory failure, Acute respiratory distress syndrome, SARS-CoV-2

Abbreviations:
HFOT: High‑Flow Oxygenation Therapy; O2: Oxygen; FiO2: Fraction Inspiration of Oxygen; CO2: Carbon Dioxide; NIPPV: Non‑Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation; VT: Tidal Volume; CPAP: Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; PEEP: Positive End Expiratory Pressure; ARDS: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome; SARS-CoV-2: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2; ICU: Intensive Care Unit
Ventilation means the absorption of oxygen and the removal of carbon dioxide, which is necessary for the life of humans. Sometimes this vital activity is disturbed for various reasons. Consequently, its management should enhance tissue oxygenation with the aim of improving metabolism and contributing to respiratory effort during various support modalities [1,2].

Respiratory problems and ventilation impairment are common in the peri-operative period, patients with co-morbidities and lung diseases and; ventilation support is one of the principles of resuscitation and treatment in critically ill patients [1,3,4].

There are various methods for patients' respiratory support. Some of these methods are accompanied by artificial or mechanical ventilation, and some methods are based on increasing the percentage of respiratory oxygen. Hypoxia and hypoxemia is solved by increasing fraction inspiration of oxygen (FiO2) in most cases but; there are also patients who do not suffer from a decrease in blood oxygen lonely, and they have carbon dioxide retention. In these cases, it is necessary to think about the removal of carbon dioxide (Co2), and since the pressure of carbon dioxide is related to the amount of minute ventilation of the alveoli, it is necessary to somehow increase the effective ventilation of the alveoli [1,5,6].

Minute ventilation is manipulated through invasive or noninvasive respiratory support to ensure adequate alveolar ventilation. Invasive oxygen delivery methods are performed based on tracheal intubation, and non-invasive traditional methods include nasal cannula, simple facial mask or facial mask plus reservoir bag, and non‑invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) [1,6,7].

NIPPV is the conventional method of respiratory support in many patients because it increases tidal volume (VT) and guarantees adequate alveolar ventilation but, many patients do not tolerate mask of non-invasive ventilation and; the use of high-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) is an effective treatment option. HFOT can have advantages over NIPPV; While NIPPV interfaces increase anatomical dead space, HFOT actually decreases dead space [8-10].

Administering supplemental oxygen to the patient is divided into two main types; Low-flow oxygenation and high-flow oxygenation methods. Oxygen is usually administered through low-flow systems such as a nasal cannula or a simple face mask and; the amount of oxygen required is based on a percentage of the patient's minute ventilation, ranging from 1 to 6 L/min. An alternative method is high-flow oxygen administration [1,8,9]. This prescription can be done through a venturia mask or special intranasal cannula (nasal prong) as HFOT [1,10,11].

HFOT concepts are increasingly accepted as a non-invasive form of respiratory support because patients usually cannot tolerate continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or NIPPV for long periods because of the compressive effects of the mask on the face and insufficient warming and humidification of inspired gas.

The innovation of ventilation systems developed for adults that reliably deliver warmed, humidified mixed air/oxygen at high flows through the prong has led to increased use of HFOT [7,9,12].

While there is controversy regarding the indication and method of HFOT uses and its impact on patient outcomes, some published reports suggest that HFOT can be a useful strategy in ventilation management. HFOT is a method in which a warmed, humidified gases is delivered to the beginning of the respiratory tract through a nasal prong with a high flow rate [1,2,13,14]. In HFOT, a mixture of air and oxygen with inspired oxygen concentrations of up to 100% and a maximum adjustable flow of up to 60 L/min is warmed and humidified by passing through an active humidifier and delivered through a circuit to the beginning of the airways [1,15,16].

There are various devices to provide high flow of humidified oxygen and air for administration through nasal cannula. These devices consist of intranasal tube with wide-bore prongs connected to an oxygen flow meter with an air-oxygen gas mixer, gas analyzer and Oxygen sources. The heating and humidification blender heats the gases to a temperature between 33ºC and 43ºC and creates a humidity of 95 to 100 % [2,17,18]. The size of the opening of the nasal cannula can be different according to the comfort and choice of the patient. Some patients prefer standard cannula and some prefer large holes to reduce the output pressure. An interface is available for use with tracheostomy tubes [1,2,16].

Physiological benefits of using HFOT include reducing dehydration of airway mucosa, improving clearance of respiratory tract secretions, increased tidal volume, reducing alveolar atelectasis and decreased respiratory rate. The use of High- flow gas wash outs CO2 from the breathing system, reduces anatomical dead space and acts as a reservoir of oxygen (O2) in the body until FIO2 is more than air room O2 concentration [4,6,8,16].

Although HFOT is an open system, high flow through the cannula creates resistance to expiratory flow and increases airway pressure, exerting physiologic properties similar to CPAP or Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) and makes an increased end-expiratory volume. This condition may have a beneficial effect on alveolar recruitment [2,16,18].

Park [9,10] measured pressure of nasopharyngeal space in patients. Nasopharyngeal pressure increased during HFOT about 2.7 ± 1.04 CmH2O with the closed mouth and 1.2 ± 0.76 CmH2O with the open mouth during HFOT with a 35 L/min flow rate.8, 9 Mouth opening or closing significantly affects pharyngeal positive pressure. It is almost accepted that HFOT causes an increase in pharyngeal pressure of about 3-5 cmH2O so, it causes an increase in lung volumes. Studies has been shown that using HFOT increases the end-expiratory lung volume, but its effect on the improvement of oxygenation is uncertain [8-10,18-20].

HFOT has been used in the peri- intubation and post extubation period of abdominal and cardiac surgery, post-surgical respiration impairment, acute heart failure and pulmonary edema, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), management of respiratory failure in the intensive care unit, Lung cancer, Pneumonia, Bronchiectasis, chest trauma and ribs fracture, Obstructive sleep apnea, difficult airway management, and during bronchoscopy.

Some studies show that HFOT reduces the need for endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure, but has no effect on overall mortality [6-9].

HFOT is increasingly used as part of the basic care management of respiratory failure in the emergency department. In a study, Dr. Raisi and colleagues investigated the effects of HFO in patients with asthma exacerbation and concluded that this method could be considered as an effective strategy in the treatment of acute asthma attacks in the selected patients [12].

Clinical evidence shows that HFOT is an effective method for the early treatment of patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure without paying attention to underlying diseases [1,2,18,20]. We used HFOT as an early treatment strategy in patients during the Covid-19 era. It seemed that HFOT had no effect on the need for intubation and the outcome of the patients, but it reduced the duration of the patient's stay in the Intensive care unit (ICU). It also had significant impact on patient morale and decrease breathing effort. HFOT had a positive effect on extubating time and it reduced the need for re-intubation. We concluded that HFOT in patients whom suffer from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), improves oxygenation, reduces respiratory rate and dyspnea, and helps patients to be discharged faster, resulting in a shorter ICU stay. This oxygen administration strategy is more economical, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic and the shortage of beds in intensive care units, because mechanical ventilation is not required and oxygen therapy can be started soon in different hospital departments.

In summary, high-flow oxygen administration is known as an effective non-invasive ventilation method and is considered as a simple and reliable alternative to ventilation support in critically ill patients [1]. Various devices are available for use in the HFOT set which deliver maximum flow rates and humidification. As HFOT administration becomes increasingly feasible, we anticipate growth in its use in a wide variety of clinical conditions and envision that the traditional method of oxygen administration may become a thing of the past. High flow oxygen therapy is recommended for people who have respiratory distress and still have low oxygen levels despite using traditional oxygen therapy. HFOT is effective for the treatment of mild to moderate hyper carbic hypoxemic respiratory failure.

We need more accurate evidence to determine basic criteria for HFOT administration during treatment, such as criteria for starting, stopping, using sedation, and determining non-responsiveness in order to intubate the patient and start aggressive ventilation.

APPRECIATION

The authors are grateful for the efforts of colleagues at Shahid Sayad Shirazi Hospital of Gorgan and Golestan University of Medical Sciences (GoUMS).

FINANCIAL SUPPORT AND SPONSORSHIP

Nil.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

There are no conflicts of interest.

  1. Jabbari A, Alijanpour E, Tabasi S (2019) Clinical usage of high‑flow oxygenation in post cardiac surgery patients. Ann Card Anaesth 22: 107-108.
  2. Ospina-Tascon GA, Calderon-Tapia LE, Garcia AF, Zarama V, Gómez-Álvarez F, et al. (2021) Effect of High-Flow Oxygen Therapy vs. Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Clinical Recovery in Patients With Severe COVID-19. JAMA 326(21): 2161-2171.
  3. Mauri T, Turrini C, Eronia N, Grasselli G, Volta CA, et al. (2017) Physiologic effects of high-flow nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 195(9): 1207-1215.
  4. Piraino T (2019) Noninvasive respiratory support in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Respir Care 64(6): 638-646.
  5. Frat J-P, Thille AW, Mercat A, Girault C, Ragot S, et al. (2015) FLORALI Study Group; REVA Network. High-flow oxygen through nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 372(23): 2185-2196.
  6. Rochwerg B, Granton D, Wang DX, Helviz Y, Einav S, et al. (2019) High flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 45(5): 563-572.
  7. Rittayamai N, Tscheikuna J, Rujiwit P (2014) High-flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy after endotracheal extubation: A randomized crossover physiologic study. Respir Care 59: 485.
  8. Azoulay E, Lemiale V, Mokart D, Nseir S, Argaud L, et al. (2018) Effect of high-flow nasal oxygen vs standard oxygen on 28-day mortality in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure: The HIGH randomized clinical trial. JAMA 320(20): 2099-2107.
  9. Parke R, McGuinness S, Eccleston M (2009) Nasal high-flow therapy delivers low level positive airway pressure. Br J Anaesth 103(6): 886-890.
  10. Parke RL, Bloch A, McGuinness SP (2015) Effect of very-high-flow nasal therapy on airway pressure and end-expiratory lung impedance in healthy volunteers. Respir Care 60(10): 1397-1403.
  11. Riera J, Pe´rez P, Corte´s J, Roca O, Masclans JR, et al. (2013) Effect of high-flow nasal cannula and body position on end-expiratory lung volume: A cohort study using electrical impedance tomography. Respir Care 58(4): 589-596.
  12. Raeisi S, Fakharian A, Ghorbani F, Jamaati HR, Mirenayat MS (2019) Value and Safety of High Flow Oxygenation in the Treatment of Inpatient Asthma: A Randomized, Double-blind, Pilot Study. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol 18(6): 615-623.
  13. Ferreyro BL, Angriman F, Munshi L, Sorbo LD, Ferguson ND, et al. (2020) Association of noninvasive oxygenation strategies with all-cause mortality in adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 324(1): 57-67.
  14. Ashraf-Kashani N, Kumar R (2017) High-flow nasal oxygen therapy. BJA Educ 17(2): 63-67.
  15. Cuquemelle E, Lellouche F (2013) Assessment of humidification performance: still no easy method! Respir Care 58: 1559-1561.
  16. Lu Z, Chang W, Meng S, Xue M, Xie J, et al. (2020) The Effect of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications and Hospital Length of Stay in Postoperative Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Intensive Care Med 35(10): 1129-1140.
  17. Mauri T, Alban L, Turrini C, Cambiaghi B, Carlesso E, et al. (2017) Optimum support by high-flow nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: Effects of increasing flow rates. Intensive Care Med 43: 1453.
  18. Kang BJ, Koh Y, Lim C-M, Huh JW, Baek S, et al. (2015) Failure of high-flow nasal cannula therapy may delay intubation and increase mortality. Intensive Care Med 41: 623.
  19. Messika J, Ahmed KB, Gaudry S, Miguel-Montanes R, Rafat C, et al. (2015) Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy in Subjects with ARDS: A 1-Year Observational Study. Respir Care 60: 162.
  20. Miguel-Montanes R, Hajage D, Messika J, Bertrand F, Gaudry S, et al. (2015) Use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy to prevent desaturation during tracheal intubation of intensive care patients with mild-to-moderate hypoxemia. Crit Care Med 43: 574.